Placements
CAT 2023
KCafe Dubai
Campus Tour
RTI Responses
Rankings
Upskill
Salaries
Career Show

The Freedom 251 Pricing Is Actually A Brilliant Marketing Move - Here's Why

Comments
 

Vishnu Shankar

Thank you for your valuable insight Sir!

19 Feb 2016, 10.12 PM

Stuti Chakraborty

Integrated Masters Scholar at Tata Institute of Social Sciences- School of Vocational Education

Nice to read and I completely agree.A marketing Strategy seldom used,so effectively in indian scenario.Thanks for the insight. regards Stuti

20 Feb 2016, 07.50 AM

Sayantan Banerjee

Sir, I beg to disagree with the argument you have given. You say they have saved a lot on marketing expenses. Lets say the loss is 90% on each set which is around a loss of Rs. 2500 per set. Lets consider Rs. 2000 25 lakh bookings is what the company was targeting and got. That puts the total loss to Rs. 500 crore. Now lets look at a new entry to the Indian market in smartphone. ASUS. Its revenue is around $200million in India of which 50% comes from smartphone. http://www.businessinsider.in/Asus-partners-Foxconn-to-make-smartphones-in-India/articleshow/49185096.cms even considering the total revenue, that's around Rs. 1400 crore. So a company having the topline as Rs. 1400 crore, I don't find it feasible to spend Rs. 500 crore on marketing. For a new entry with nothing lined up, its even more unfeasible. To top that, freedom251 has advertised in newspapers as well. So there is some cost beyond Rs. 500 crore. I fail to understand how it has managed to save anything in marketing. Yes the strategy might be mind blowing with the name now imprinted in the minds of everyone who are a potential customer, but what I feel is that, its come at too high a cost, that too if it actually launches any other new set at normal price. Again, with this launch, Ringing Bell has positioned itself as a inexpensieve brand. Can it survive when it launches even higher priced phones? The reason why Maruti or Nokia or for that matter Tata Nano could not reposition itself no matter how much it tried or is trying to.

20 Feb 2016, 03.01 PM

Shubham Shubham

If you call a pathetic, fraudulent and unethical marketing move brilliant, you need help.

21 Feb 2016, 11.04 AM

Mini Mock Test

HitBullsEye National Mock CAT Test- March

Participants: 98

Top One Percent GMAT Full Mock-March

Participants: 13

Hitbullseye CAT 2023 VARC-March

Participants: 137

Hitbullseye CAT 2023 DILR-March

Participants: 51

Hitbullseye CAT 2023 QA-March

Participants: 43

VARC 2023 - Test 19

Participants: 1205

MBA Admissions 2023 - WAT 20

Participants: 112

MBA Admissions 2023 - WAT 19

Participants: 36

MBA Admissions 2023 - WAT 18

Participants: 17

MBA Admissions 2023 - WAT 17

Participants: 18

MBA Admissions 2023 - WAT 16

Participants: 11

MBA Admissions 2023 - WAT 15

Participants: 17

MBA Admissions 2023 - WAT 14

Participants: 15

MBA Admissions 2023 - WAT 13

Participants: 17

MBA Admissions 2023 - WAT 12

Participants: 18

MBA Admissions 2023 - WAT 11

Participants: 17

MBA Admissions 2023 - WAT 10

Participants: 18

MBA Admissions 2023 - WAT 9

Participants: 13

MBA Admissions 2023 - WAT 8

Participants: 12

MBA Admissions 2023 - WAT 7

Participants: 17

MBA Admissions 2023 - WAT 6

Participants: 14

MBA Admissions 2023 - WAT 5

Participants: 20

MBA Admissions 2023 - WAT 4

Participants: 29

MBA Admissions 2023 - WAT 3

Participants: 25

MBA Admissions 2023 - WAT 2

Participants: 38

MBA Admissions 2023 - WAT 1

Participants: 80

Unilever Changemakers 2023

Participants: 27

WAT-PI | Current Affairs: Sports

Participants: 152

NMAT Logical Reasoning 2

Participants: 163

IIFT Quant - 1

Participants: 422

Take Free Test Here

Comments
 

Vishnu Shankar

Thank you for your valuable insight Sir!

19 Feb 2016, 10.12 PM

Stuti Chakraborty

Integrated Masters Scholar at Tata Institute of Social Sciences- School of Vocational Education

Nice to read and I completely agree.A marketing Strategy seldom used,so effectively in indian scenario.Thanks for the insight. regards Stuti

20 Feb 2016, 07.50 AM

Sayantan Banerjee

Sir, I beg to disagree with the argument you have given. You say they have saved a lot on marketing expenses. Lets say the loss is 90% on each set which is around a loss of Rs. 2500 per set. Lets consider Rs. 2000 25 lakh bookings is what the company was targeting and got. That puts the total loss to Rs. 500 crore. Now lets look at a new entry to the Indian market in smartphone. ASUS. Its revenue is around $200million in India of which 50% comes from smartphone. http://www.businessinsider.in/Asus-partners-Foxconn-to-make-smartphones-in-India/articleshow/49185096.cms even considering the total revenue, that's around Rs. 1400 crore. So a company having the topline as Rs. 1400 crore, I don't find it feasible to spend Rs. 500 crore on marketing. For a new entry with nothing lined up, its even more unfeasible. To top that, freedom251 has advertised in newspapers as well. So there is some cost beyond Rs. 500 crore. I fail to understand how it has managed to save anything in marketing. Yes the strategy might be mind blowing with the name now imprinted in the minds of everyone who are a potential customer, but what I feel is that, its come at too high a cost, that too if it actually launches any other new set at normal price. Again, with this launch, Ringing Bell has positioned itself as a inexpensieve brand. Can it survive when it launches even higher priced phones? The reason why Maruti or Nokia or for that matter Tata Nano could not reposition itself no matter how much it tried or is trying to.

20 Feb 2016, 03.01 PM

Shubham Shubham

If you call a pathetic, fraudulent and unethical marketing move brilliant, you need help.

21 Feb 2016, 11.04 AM